Role of Stress and Job Performance among Banks Employees: An Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51983/ajms-2014.3.1.1148Keywords:
Stress, Job performance, Banking sector, Technology, LPGAbstract
At the present scenario banking sector has undergone tremendous changes in the recent past. Liberalisation, Globalisation and Privatisation entry of foreign banks, technological developments and increased competition has made banks to strive hard for success. Banks are not thinking in terms of traditional services but value added benefits to the customers for competitive advantage. This has put pressure on the employees of banks to render better job performance in terms of results. Due to this, the employees face role overload, role ambiguity which are the symptoms of role stress. The study tests role stress and its impact on job performance by using (n=95) data of employees including managers, officers and clerks of banks in Gulbarga. The data obtained through questionnaires were analyzed using statistical tools like Mean, Standard deviation and Regression. The analysis of variance revealed significant difference between Role Stress with Gender , Education levels, Designation, Income levels and Age groups of respondents.
References
Cronbach, L. J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16:3, 297-334.
George D & Mallery P (2003) SPSS for windows step by step: A sample Guide & reference Boston; Allyn & Bacon. [3] Guttman, L. 1945. A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10:4, 255-282.
Kristof, W. 1963. The statistical theory of stepped-up reliability coefficients when a test has been divided into several equivalent parts. Psychometrika, 28:3, 221-238.
Kristof, W. 1969. Estimation of true score and error variance for tests under various equivalence assumptions. Psychometrika, 34:4, 489- 507.
McGraw, K. O., and S. P. Wong. 1996. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1:1, 30-46.
Norusis, M. 2004. SPSS 13.0 Statistical Procedures Companion. Upper Saddle-River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, Inc..
Novick, M. R., and C. Lewis. 1967. Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. Psychometrika, 32:1, 1-13.
Shrout, P. E., and J. L. Fleiss. 1979. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86:, 420-428.
Pareek, U. (2002), Training Instruments in HRD and OD, 2nd Ed., Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi.
Pareek, U. (2004), Understanding Organizational Behavior, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
Pestonjee, D. M. (1999), Stress and Coping ñ The Indian Experience, 2nd Edition, Sage Publications India Private Limited, New Delhi.
Robbins, S. P. and Sanghi, S. (2006), Organizational Behavior, 11th Ed., Indian Subcontinent Adaptation, Dorling Kindersley (India) Private Limited, New Delhi.
Srivastav, A. K. (1993), Study of Organizational Climate, Role Stress & Coping Strategy amongst Public Sector Executives, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Bangalore University, India.
Yan Liu, A. D. (2010). The Impact of Outliers on Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha Estimate of Reliability: Ordinal/Rating Scale Item Responses. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 70 (1), 5-21.
Sheskin, D. J. (2004). Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statastical Procedures (3rd Edition ed.). Chapman & HalVCRC Washington, D.C.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 The Research Publication
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
